Over-eating is a factor in climate change. Every seven days that a person eats 500 extra calories, 3,500 calories, or one pound of fat is made. 500 calories equals the average fast-food burger, a rich coffee drink, falafel w/ rice, etc. 

Multiply that by millions of overweight Democrats. 

 If any human behavior can create ecological stress, then overeating is a major contributor to climate stress. 

Unnecessary eating requires a lot of water, fuel, chemicals, and electricity to grow, process, and deliver the over-consumed food. And over-consumption puts an additional strain on the ecology because of waste management, of both food wrappers and feces. Every food wrapper and every drink cup needs to be disposed of, and excreted food products need to be processed by a sewage treatment plant. Human over-ingestion shortens the lifespan of sewage machinery.  

And obesity strains our electric grid in the summertime via air conditioning.

Have Democrats actually charted the environmental impact of every pound of Democrat obesity? 

They should do this, if they want to show any science-cred on this issue. 

 Do people understand that 'Green Living' includes taking personal responsibility for the environment, which requires lifestyle accountability, with someone else perhaps setting their individual daily calorie intake? 

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/03/tiny-sensor-your-tooth-could-help-keep-you-healthy This is a new type of tooth-sensor that the Green New Deal advocates could use to monitor the intake of obese people, to help keep our planet safe, with a mandatory installation policy, like mandatory vaccines. Like 1984.

And if we have calorie restrictions, do you think we will be allowed to own pets? Let that sink in, Hooman.

The Green New Deal, in full bloom, will mean that pets, including most horses, will be classified as 'useless eaters' 

and will be exterminated.

Then what happens to women who keep a dog for protection? 

Well, along with gun control, if no one owns a gun, how much violence can there be in America?

We know the answer to that question, don't we?

Some 'Greenists' are either ignorant or hypocritical about LRV (light Reflective Value).

LRV is the amount of sunlight reflected by the colors we choose. The energy in the sunlight is either reflected back into the atmosphere, or absorbed and changed into radiant or conductive heat. Look at the scale above.

Greeners should not own black cars, only silver or white vehicles. They should not have any color roof on the house but white.

Only those born with dark hair should be allowed to have dark hair. When hair goes grey, darkening should not be allowed.

All roofs should be white.

All cars should be silver-grey, since white cars are so hard to keep clean.

all-you-can   whatever should be banned, for their waste. 

Math Question:

What is the final analysis on wind towers; given the resources require to build and maintain, v. their energy production?

Which is more efficient, to pipeline, truck or trackrail our oil supplies.

How much energy was used for the last Superbowl, or the NBA World Series, or other playoffs

and what about the Olympics, its logistics and  massive building projects for 16 days of international competition?

PS: according to:

https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/how-hot-can-solar-panels-get

solar panels are 36 degrees warmer than the ambient air

Factor this in to the equation for climate change.

Eric J. Rose