I wonder, how do people consider after-sex-STD testing a benefit to themselves when it is not done after every new sex partner?
Imagine the female that says to herself at a Friday night party:
“I don’t know if the man hitting on me is carrying any diseases, but I’m willing to let his semen splash around in me for a while,
until my next exam and we’ll see anything is growing besides a baby.
I need the attention and need to show other females that I can be preferred over them.
I get tested every six months, so, I can’t infect any more than 3 or 4 other men, and it serves them right, if I have something.
But his hair is clean, so he must be disease free, right?”
I use the female as the worst-case scenario,
because it is logical that those who receive and hold body fluids operate as a sexual receptacle, and are more likely to catch a disease than penetrators, because sexual receptacles are in contact with the contaminated body fluids for a longer time, eh?
If you've ever done dishes by hand, you know the stewpot is harder to clean than the spoon that stirred the stew.
Double-Dipping
Have you ever seen females at a party get all grossed-out when a crude-dude double-dips a chip at the food table?
EEEEEEWWWW!!! they say.
But, after a few beers, many of these same females will be off somewhere with men they just met, accepting untested body fluids.
EEEEEEWWWW!!!
Eric J. Rose